Let's take a look at the 19 members of the S&P/TSX Clean Technology Index (see link on this page)"... whose activities provide value-added solutions to environmental problems". The Index members are not tiny start-ups - S&P selects only companies with C$100 million or more in market cap with enough stock trading volume and shares outstanding available for trading to be reasonably liquid.
Eliminating The Unprofitable Companies
By clicking on the stock symbols in the Constituent Companies list and then the Financials tab for each company on the TMX Money website, we are able to quickly see that these companies have chronic and/or repeated big losses:
These companies may eventually be highly profitable and for many hope springs eternal (which some of the stock price charts for these companies suggest!), but for now, we say, no thanks and move on to the proven performers.
Nine Profitable Clean Tech Companies
More than half the profitable (i.e. positive Net Income) group consists of renewable hydro and wind power generation firms:
- Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp (TSX symbol AQN)
- Macquarie Power & Infrastructure (MPT.UN)
- Boralex Inc (BLX)
- Northland Power Income Fund (NPI.UN)
- Brookfield Renewable Power Fund (BRC.UN)
Two of the power companies - Macquarie and Brookfield - have yet to convert from the income trust structure to corporations, as they are being in effect forced to do by the federal tax change (see previous posts on this topic here and here) to take effect January 1st, 2011, but both Brookfield and Macquarie have announced the intention to convert. When that happens they will likely reduce cash distributions by about a third.
One power company - Boralex - is an interesting case. Boralex Inc has been in the throes of a takeover attempt (apparently likely to be successful under revised terms) on the similarly-named but separate income trust Boralex Power Income Fund, which has its own listing under BPT.UN and has not not been profitable.
The other four present a range of CleanTech sectors:
- ATS Automation Tooling Systems Inc (ATA) - Designs, manufactures and installs factory automation solutions for various industries including telecommunications, semiconductor, fibre optics, automotive, computers, healthcare, electronics, solar energy and consumer products. It has not had a long track record of profits. It was not profitable until 2008 but has maintained it through the recession in 2009. No dividends yet.
- Newalta Corporation (NAL) - Delivers industrial waste management and environmental services to customers across Canada. After a big dip in Net Income in 2009, it increased its dividend in August.
- RuggedCom Inc (RCM) - Designs and manufactures ruggedized communications equipment for harsh electrical and climatic environments. Its high P/E ratio of 39.6 says the market price anticipates strong rises in profits but it is not yet paying a dividend.
- WaterFurnace Renewable Energy Inc (WFI) - Designs, manufactures and distributes geothermal and water-source HVAC systems for residential, commercial and institutional applications. Profits have dipped in 2009, not much of a surprise for a company heavily dependent on the US housing sector but it did increase its dividend in the first quarter of 2010.
None of the profitable CleanTech stocks has exactly been a market darling powering to lofty heights over the past five years as all but one stock - WaterFurnace - has done no better and in most cases much worse than the TSX Composite. However, over the past year the chart below shows that four of the power companies have done considerably better than the TSX Composite. WaterFurnace itself made all its gains in 2006; in 2009 -2010 it has seriously under-performed, falling while the TSX has risen. It seems that there is no GreenTech bubble so far.
Several of these stocks, notably Macquarie, Algonquin, Waterfurnace and perhaps Newalta, exhibit reasonably attractive combinations of low P/E, low P/B and growing dividends, enough perhaps to make them candidates for a potential buy. The final judgment as to whether any of these stocks is worth an investment needs to rely on much more than simple past profitability or ratios and a thorough examination of financial reports and each company's prospects would be the next step for the investor.
However, it is encouraging to know that clean technology companies can be considered more than a politically correct fad. Some do indeed appear to have credible investment potential.
Disclaimer: this post is my opinion only and should not be construed as investment advice. Readers should be aware that the above comparisons are not an investment recommendation. They rest on other sources, whose accuracy is not guaranteed and the article may not interpret such results correctly. Do your homework before making any decisions and consider consulting a professional advisor.